NOIR
Robert Coover
A new novel from Robert Coover is always an event. He has published over 20 works of fiction, including The Origin of the Brunists (1966), The Universal Baseball Association, J. Henry Waugh, Prop. (1968), Gerald's Party (1986), John's Wife (1996), and The Adventures of Lucky Pierre (Director's Cut) (2002). His notorious 1977 novel, The Public Burning, about the executions of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg for alleged atomic espionage, features as narrator one Vice President Richard Nixon, who manages both to consummate a fatal lech for Ethel in the electric chair and subsequently fall in love with an Uncle Sam who treats him to a little anal rape. The book was rumoured to have been shortlisted for the Pulitzer -- which, however, went to no one that year. In view of years of delayed publication thanks to threats from Nixon's lawyers, and a no-lawsuit deal in which the publisher agreed to kill the book's promotion campaign and remainder it instantly, it is not so surprising that even in the post-Watergate era the Pulitzer Prize jury looked elsewhere. One used book dealer has told me, though, that The Public Burning was the "fastest-selling remainder" he'd ever seen.
Like certain other very different novelists, Graham Greene and Gore Vidal, Coover has alternated more substantial works with "entertainments," more or less comic, sometimes "mere" novellas. Coover, who loves to probe the stories behind stories, has used shorter fiction to explore and play with pop genres, particularly in film. He started with short stories in A Night at the Movies, or You Must Remember This (1987) but soon expanded. Charlie in the House of Rue (1980) conducts Charlie Chaplin's Little Tramp round a fantasmagoric whorehouse (anticipating the erotic divigations of Lucky Pierre), as Ghost Town (1998) rides a desert John Ford would not recognize (though Sergio Leone might) through every sort of classic western motif into and out of which sagebrush and saloon and showdown can morph.
Noir (Overlook Duckworth, Peter Mayer Publishers, Inc., New York, London, 2010) plays in the gutter where Raymond Chandler famously praised, and thanked, Dashiell Hammet for dragging murder out of the drawing room. One difference between it and Coover's earlier comic novellas is that, notwithstanding every shadow, rain puddle, and venetian blind-stricken light it reflects from every crime and detective flick you've ever watched, Noir follows Chandler down those mean streets, not Huston or Hawks or Wilder or Mann. (Oh, maybe Welles and The Lady From Shanghai.) The homage even extends to Chandler's hopelessly un-unravelling plots, multi-page anti-climactic expos of what should have been dramatized if the author hadn't painted himself into more intriguing corners, and of course -- de rigeur-mortis -- the blonde fatale.
It can be argued that, as earlier with Georges Simenon's Inspector Maigret novels, and later with Ross MacDonald's Lew Archer novels, the true purpose of Chandler's detective stories is the exploration of milieu, especially social milieu. Chandler writes of the cityscape of Los Angeles, low and high, with the sardonic lyricism of a cheated lover. But in most film noir of the late 1940's-early 1950's the identity of the cityscape -- LA or NYC or SF -- is incidental; it's the nightside, the underside of whatever city that the camera gives its eye. The one aspect of Noir that pays more homage to the film than the literary tradition is disregard of city identity. The milieu Philip M. Noir explores yes, that's his throw-away joke of a name, and we can guess what M. stands for though he never lets on the milieu Phil M. Noir explores is ... the docklands.
As nobody rereads Chandler for the whodunit, I won't give away the plot ofNoir. It starts and ends, or returns eternally, with a knock-out lady in black; but you knew that already. No matter how adroitly Coover plays peekaboo with clues, what really keeps the pages turning is the pleasure of his prose. Here are the docklands:
But speaking of character, who is this Philip M. Noir anyway? The first clue if you haven't guessed is the first word of the novella: You. As in: "You are at the morgue." Philip M. has no more backstory than Philip Marlowe. Because you, the reader, are him, and him as projected voyeur -- you. You -- and he -- are, above all, style.
You are at the morgue. The light is weird. Shadowless, but like a negative, as though the light itself were shadow turned inside out. The stiffs are out of sight, temporarily archived in drawers like meaty data, chilled to their own bloodless temperature. Their stories have not ended, only their own readings of them. In your line of work, this is not a place where things end so much as a place where they begin. |