![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summer 2016, Web Issue 18
Contributing Editors: Web Editors:
|
David Jones, Martyrdom, 1927 watercolour, pencil and black ink __________________
Gregory Baker ‘An edition of Jones's address to the University of Wales on receiving the honorary degree of Litterarum Doctor, 15 July 1960’ Jasmine Hunter-Evans ‘Bridging the Breaks: David Jones and the Continuity of Culture’ Thomas Goldpaugh ‘The Signum of Some Otherness: David Jones and a Eucharistic Theory of Art’ Kathleen Henderson Staudt “Acts of Ars” in David Jones's The Anathemata & W.H. Auden's Horae Canonicae Thomas Dilworth ‘David Jones and the Celtic Tradition in English Literature’ Malcolm Guite ‘Incarnation, Bodies and Locality: The Incarnational Thrust of David Jones's Art’ Paul Robichaud ‘Images of Making in the Poetry of David Jones’ William F. Blissett ‘David Jones: Seventy Years with David Jones’ Fr. Dominic White, O.P & Sr. Rose Rolling, O.P. ‘Minor Prophets: David Jones and Contemporary Art at Blackfriars, Cambridge’ from Bradford Haas:
In this issue... DAVID JONES returns! FlashPøint #13, Spring 2010, showcased the art of Welsh poet and painter David Jones, as well as scholarly reflections on his poetry. Two years later the David Jones Society held a new conference on Jones at Washington Adventist University in Takoma Park, Maryland. This issue of FlashPøint features papers presented at that conference. Kathleen Henderson Staudt introduces a host of essays by Thomas Dilworth on Jones and the Celtic tradition in English literature, Jasmine Hunter-Evans on “breaks” and “bridges” in the continuity of culture, Thomas Goldpaugh and Staudt herself on different significant aspects of Jones's The Anathemata, Malcolm Guite on the “Incarnational thrust” of Jones's art, Paul Robichaud on the key Jonesian theory of “making,” Gregory Baker's edition of an address by Jones to the University of Wales in 1960, as well as William F. Blissett's reflections on new directions for projects on Jones's work in light of his own friendship with the poet/painter. Fr. Dominic White, O.P. and Sr. Rose Rolling, O.P. introduce a 2021 exhibition of art/word as ‘creative deed’ in David Jones and Contemporary Art at Blackfriars, Cambridge. FlashPøint editor Bradford Haas adds a rich sheaf of Culture & Artifice: The Major Book Illustrations of David Jones following Jones's explorations of word and image in the prose tales of others, including The Book of Jonah, The Chester Play of the Deluge, and The Rime of the Ancient Mariner. David Jones has further company in this issue of FlashPøint. One wonders what painter Jones would think of Tim Wengertsman's work, but at the very least it would likely leave him arrested, not to say mesmerized. John Ryskamp's new play, “The Curtain Rises on the Revolution”, has startled one reader to write: Catchwords & banalities storm through & about the protagonist in John Ryskamp's “The Curtain Rises on the Revolution,” pummeling outward into single-sentence vignettes. Does he swat them off or is he batting them forward? From the play: “Ryskamp likes to guide his audience two fingers in the nostrils back to the stage.” and “Are we dreaming Ryskamp or is he dreaming us?” Heady company for Master Jones! Even headier, Robert Coover takes (off) on a boyhood contemporary of Jones—Mark Twain—as he imagines what Twain did not—Huck Finn's (and Tom Sawyer's) later adventures after &ldquot;lightin' out for the Territory.” JR Foley booknotes Coover's new Huck Out West…as well as a brand-new selection of Coover's short fictions, circa 1962ř2016, entitled Going for a Beer. These shorties are never less than either funny or scary…or both at once. More heady company comes in the form of two episodes, “Bonus Army” and “Diabasis,” from Jon Woodson's new novel, “Summer Games,” wherein four Black grad students drive cross-country from Washington, D.C., and the Bonus Army camp on Anacostia Flats, to the 1932 Olympic Summer Games in Los Angeles. Let it not be said that the tales of Woodson are ever exercises in historical naturalism. Nor, for that matter, are the fictions of Pete O'Brien, who returns to FlashPøint with a “Sheaf of Flashes 4,” plus “whistles the jackdaw” and “29 may 2016: four poems.” Pete O'Brien also presents FlashPøint readers with a Clarice Lispector Special! celebrating the Brazilian novelist who contributed her own gender-bending, image-smashing storytelling innovations to the Nueva Novela Hispanoamericana. The six-page Special! explores Clarice's life and works as well as her impact on others, especially storytellers and poets writing today. In "The Swallow" Joan McCracken takes us further into the passion and exuberant vision of Miriam amid lovers past and future. Then one of the lovers remembers Miriam in Ode to a Nightingale. But this seems game-playing in the face of what Pier Paolo Pasolini attempted in his never&$45;produced screenplay St. Paul, which retold the early days of Christianity—transplanted to Nazi-dominated France—before, as Pasolini shows it, Satan and St. Luke turned it into a Church. Luciana Bohne in recounting the scenario asks: is it “a prophecy of our times?” And Ictus bites again! Canus Ictus, fool and gadfly exiled by Rome, wanders his isle of bones and skulls reminiscing of orgies and massacres past, invoking ghostly Spartacus, shipwrecks, battles with Spartoi, and the last time he and Loquatia wasted no time. With Peter Dale Scott's Walking on Darkness set to appear later this year, FlashPøint is proud to present Six Poems from this new collection. Inspired by Peter Dale Scott's poem Tavern Underworld, Carlo Parcelli gives us More Fun House East, 1969 weaving two personal, polar opposite experiences into a helix of insight.
Enjoy FlashPøint #18!
A Comment on this issue... Some might wonder why we're juxtaposing works by the avowedly religious David Jones with a piece about the Marxist filmmaker Pier Paolo Pasolini's unfinished film ‘St. Paul,’, the art work of the Punk woodcut artist Tim Wengertsman, and the work of the avowedly irreligious poet Carlo Parcelli. But the juxtapositions are connected by a moral & aesthetic thread. David Jones shied away from the blasphemous curses of his Cockney WWI trench comrades, but he described their inherent power as ‘almost liturgical,’ And Pasolini noted that “Every blasphemy is a sacred word.” Jones felt technology & modernity impoverished contemporary society. In his 1959 statement to the Bollingen Foundation he remarked that: “For now the artist becomes, willy-nilly, a sort of Boethius, who has been nicknamed ‘the Bridge,’ because he carried forward into an altogether metamorphosed world certain of the fading oracles which had sustained antiquity.”This comports with Pasolini's views. For Pasolini, as critic Stefania Benini has noted, “The sacred embodies the nemesis of modernity.” Benini summarizes Pasolini's views from his notable 1970 interview with Jean Duflot: “He looks back nostagically to the mythical relationship of ancient civilizations with nature and the earth from the extreme margins of the ‘universo orrendo’ (‘horrendous universe’) perceived, from a Marxist perspective, as the dominion of bourgeois homogenization and consumerism.”And Jones continues with what could apply to Tim Wengertsman's desire to document the otherwise marginilazed Punk subculture of himself and his friends in Hartford, CT: “My view is that all artists […] are in fact ‘showers forth’ of things which tend to be impoverished, or misconceived, or altogether lost or wilfully set aside in the preoccupations of our present intense technological phase, but which, none the less, belong to man.”In Wengertsman's work we see a powerful yearning for comraderie and meaning. The meaning often comes through the physical/spiritual use and misuse of drugs & alcohol, but the desire for what's holy to him & his companions is annointed in his work by the use of halos & other religious iconography. Wengertsman is satirical but calls justifiably for empathy, asking us to feel the pathos of the lives of his subjects along with the humor. There's a strong desire for social justice in our four artists—a desire for a way to expose the brutality imposed by humankind on one another. As one critic put it, Pasolini often used “religious/mythic imagery to ground a political critique.” David Jones suffered immeasurably from the devastation of World War I. He also found the stories of the Roman Imperium apt for depicting the hegemony of our time.In the David Jones painting “Martyrdom” above, St. Ignatius, Bishop of Antioch, is attacked by lions as punishment for his refusal to renounce his faith. He's frightened, and his vestments prove an insubstantial armor against the lions' attack. Eric Gill said of Jones that: ‘We should miss the quality of his work if we did not see that it is a combination of two enthusiasms, that of the man who is enamoured of the spiritual world and at the same time as much enamoured of the material body in which he must clothe his vision.’The lions depict the instinctive, brutal force of nature but also the ferocious desire for power on the part of the men who placed the Saint there, men such as those who gave us World War I. Carlo Parcelli uses the Roman Imperium in his poetic monologues as metaphor for our current Western Imperialist age. But his characters don't look to the spiritual. Instead they predict a hunger for recourse with the same ferocity that matches that of the lion. As one of his characters says, “The meek will stand a bear up in a pen if it's meat.”
Sources:
—Pasolini: The Sacred Flesh
All David Jones images are reproduced by the kind permission of the David Jones Estate.
We are eager to hear from you, especially about this issue, so please tell us what you think: flashpnt@hotmail.com!
|